Notice: wp_enqueue_script was called incorrectly. Scripts and styles should not be registered or enqueued until the wp_enqueue_scripts, admin_enqueue_scripts, or login_enqueue_scripts hooks. Please see Debugging in WordPress for more information. (This message was added in version 3.3.0.) in /home/immigration/public_html/wp-includes/functions.php on line 4138
UK Home Secretary heading for Human Rights showdown with Judges | Immigration Matters

Want to learn more about UK/EU Immigration Law? Click Act Now to learn more... Act Now

Call Us +44 7950 458 464 |
 Categories : News


Home Secretary Theresa May is heading for a showdown with the judiciary over the rights of foreign prisoners and visa overstayers to avoid deportation on Human Rights grounds.

May said she would bring in primary legislation if judges failed to implement new rules and guidelines expected to be introduced.

The Home Office will be seeking the backing of Parliament to give priority to deportation above the right to family life enshrined in article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR).

MPs are to be asked in the next few weeks to approve a Commons motion advising the judges that the right to family life is not absolute and should be overridden if doing so is in the national interest.

A major overhaul of the rules on family migration will be outlined later today which will mean UK citizens earning less than £18,600, depending on the number of children involved, will not be allowed to bring a foreign husband, wife or partner into Britain to live with them.

The gross income threshold is lower than the minimum £25,700 figure that May tried to persuade coalition partner Nick Clegg to accept, according to a letter leaked in March. The Conservative Home Secretary said a minimum gross income of £24,800 would be needed if there were two children involved, with a further £2,200 for each extra child. It is believed that as many as 25,000 families a year could be affected by the changes.

Critics say British citizens will face a choice of exile or splitting up their families, and warned that it would lead to a string of legal challenges under article 8.

The home secretary first promised action over article 8 at the Tory party conference last year, when she cited the case of a Bolivian man and his pet cat.

On Sunday she told the BBC she was now prepared to bring in legislation if the judges ignored the will of parliament in redefining the right to family life.

“This is not an absolute right. So in the interests of the economy or of controlling migration or of public order – those sorts of issues – the state has a right to qualify this right to a family life,” she said.

“What I am going to do is actually set out the rules and say this is what parliament, this is what the public believe is how you balance the public interest against an individual’s interest. We are going to ask parliament to vote on this to say very clearly what constitutes the right to a family life. I would expect that judges will look at what parliament has said.

“If they don’t then we will have to look at other measures and that could include primary legislation.”

But leading human rights lawyers warned that ministers could not use secondary legislation such as the immigration rules to dictate to judges or trump their interpretation of article 8.

“Parliament cannot predetermine the results of individual cases, which all depend on careful and compassionate assessment of very different facts. However merciless Mrs May may be, hard cases make bad law and politicians make bad judges,” Geoffrey Robertson QC told the Sunday Times.

Sir Geoffrey Bindman said: “Any change is ineffective because ultimately what controls the situation is article 8 as interpreted by the court of human rights and the domestic courts.

“The legal position is that in so far as the immigration rules are incompatible with the human rights convention then the convention prevails.”

Home Office figures show that 185 foreign prisoners successfully appealed against deportation last year after citing article 8. Under the new rules, foreign prisoners sentenced to between 12 months and four years would be deported in the public interest unless they had been resident in the UK for 20 years or had a foreign child who had lived here for seven years. Criminals given shorter sentences who have caused “serious harm” or who are persistent offenders would also be deported.

Visa overstayers will also find it more difficult to remain in the UK based on a relationship or a child in the UK.

Immigration advisers Bison UK are dealing with a number of appeals to stay in the UK after overstaying a visa.

The UK Border Agency recently announced that a clause in the Crime and Courts Bill will take away the full right of appeal for those applying to enter the UK as a family visitor.

See also:

Visa and Immigration Appeals on the increase

Full right of appeal removed for UK family visit visa

If you need any immigration advice, have been served with a removal or deportation order, or need advice on an appeal against a refusal please email: or visit

Spread the Word, like or share this page, your friends will also love it and thanks for it.

Do you employ foreign workers? Don't risk a £20,000 fine and a possible custodial sentence. We can advice on Entrepreneur Visas, Investor Visas and Home Office sponsor licence compliance for your business. Use the button below to schedule an appointment...


Immigration Adviser, Speaker and Author See also: Profile - Profile:!/groups/14119859749/

8 Responses to “UK Home Secretary heading for Human Rights showdown with Judges”
Read them below or add one

  1. These measures are aimed at non-EU migrants or visa overstayers. EEA nationals do not require visas to enter the UK.

  2. Would new automatic refusal for the overstayer law affect EEA National member intending to apply uder spouse application after October 1st?

    Thank you.

  3. 9 july 2012 says :

    Hi, I just want to ask one question, British called their self “civilised” I mean y british especially Tory GOVT, civilization leads to human rights and human rights leads to individual and individual build a community and community build a society and all those things come together so we call it country, and than all people work together for the economy of the country. so, rich people have no problem with the new rule of £ 18’600 but it will effects badly to poor and mostly to native, like foreigners who have their relatives back home, so this govt directly hit them by introducing this new rule, simple I ask what is the average pay of a MP’s, they never cut their allowances, benefits, etc, they always talk about poor people. so where is the civilization and where are the human rights? if a girl she is 18 and part time studying and part time working, let’s suppose she went on holidays to usa and fall in love and she can’t bring her lover to UK because she does not earn £ 18’600. Because British are civilized and know the human rights? What is the difference in UK and Dictator Arab countries, only one different here in UK we have discrimination, poor can’t bring their love to UK, but rich can, but in Dictator Arab countries this rule applies on both rich and poor, so again they (Arabs) don’t have democracy and they don’t claim their selves civilized but UK does? so this is the question. thanks

  4. […] this month Home Secretary Theresa May has told the judiciary to stop allowing visa overstayers and foreign prisoners to avoid deportation on Human Rights ‘Article 8’ […]

  5. […] Home Secretary Theresa May has issued a warning to Judges over the rights of foreign prisoners and visa overstayers who avoid deportation on Human Rights […]

  6. Henry David says :


    Do I have a family life UK?

    I married my wife legally in 2001 in Nigeria we are both NIgerians.

    We both went to Uk in 2006 where we had two children one in 2006 and the other in 2010

    I was deported after serving six months imprisonment, my wife got another partner and had another further baby in 2011

    I applied for right of access to my children in uk in 2011but the entry clearance office replied me that my wife had got another partner and article 8 is no longer relevant to me and that I am already on deportation order while my wife has denied me all access to my children that are with her and home office is aware of that

    Please is article 8 relevant to my case since my children are in UK and I have been denied all meaningful access to them

    Help please


    Henry David

  7. […] UK Home Secretary heading for Human Rights showdown with Judges […]

  8. […] UK Home Secretary heading for Human Rights showdown with Judges Tags: Bison Management UK, British citizens who marry foreigners, Cynthia Barker, dependant visa, EEA rights, ILR, Immigration Adviser, Immigration clampdown announced, immigration matters, Indefinite Leave to Remain, marry a foreigner, settlement […]

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked by *.

You must beLogged in to post a comment.