Notice: wp_enqueue_script was called incorrectly. Scripts and styles should not be registered or enqueued until the wp_enqueue_scripts, admin_enqueue_scripts, or login_enqueue_scripts hooks. Please see Debugging in WordPress for more information. (This message was added in version 3.3.0.) in /home/immigration/public_html/wp-includes/functions.php on line 4138
Interim Immigration Cap unlawful High Court Judges Rule | Immigration Matters

Want to learn more about UK/EU Immigration Law? Click Act Now to learn more... Act Now

Call Us +44 7950 458 464 |
 Categories : News


As reported yesterday by Immigration Matters the High Court in London confirmed the expected further hammer blow to Home Secretary Theresa May’s troubled plans for a interim cap on UK immigration.

Two senior judges today ruled that the temporary limit imposed from 28 June on skilled migrants from outside the European Union is unlawful due to the fact that government ministers failed to obtain proper Parliamentary approval before it was implemented and imposed on employers and migrants.

The judgment by Lord Justice Sullivan and Justice Burton followed Judicial Review legal challenges to the cap on Tier 1 and Tier 2 migration by the Joint Council for the Welfare of Immigrants (JCWI) and the English Community Care Association (ECCA).

The interim cap was hurriedly introduced by the UK Border Agency this summer to prevent a rush applications by non-EU skilled migrants. At the time Home Secretary Theresa May said the temporary cap was intended as an interim measure while the coalition Government agreed on a permanent cap to be introduced next April.

JCWI Chief Executive Habib Rahman, who brought the case on behalf of Tier 1 highly skilled migrants, said the judgment was a “victory for democracy and the rule of law”.

“It shows that the Home Secretary cannot simply sideline parliament and the requirements it has imposed to check her powers. It also has important implications for migrants in the UK who were affected by the imposition of an unlawful limit.”

The Immigration Minister Damian Green has said he is disappointed with the ruling. “We will study the judgment and will appeal it, if we have grounds.

“We will do all in our power to continue to prevent a rush of applications before our more permanent measures are in place.”

The temporary cap was designed to cut by 1,300 the number of skilled workers coming to Britain under tiers one and two of the points-based immigration system. It aimed for a 5% cut, bringing the total down to 18,700.

Liberal Democrat and coalition Business Secretary, Vince Cable, publicly voiced concerns in September that the temporary cap had done “a lot of damage to British industry”.

The limit on skilled migrants is part of a package including deep cuts in the number of overseas students. They are designed to scale back annual net migration to Britain from the “hundreds of thousands to the tens of thousands”, according to the government.

The Court of Appeal had already ruled in the summer that the Home Secretary acted unlawfully when retrospective changes were made to the former highly skilled migrant scheme (HSMP) without proper parliamentary approval.

In that ruling Lord Justice Sedley said ministers could not abandon a constitutional principle that had stood for four centuries as a pillar of democracy. “Parliament will expect the Home Secretary to lay before it any rules by which he or she proposes to manage immigration; the courts will expect such rules, like any other source of law, to be those and only those which have parliament’s approval.”

Home Office ministers announced their intention to introduce the temporary cap to Parliament but failed to detail how it would operate or the actual limit on skilled and highly skilled migrants until it came into force. Details were then posted on the Home Office website but not presented to parliament.

The ECCA, which represents thousands of care homes in the UK, were concerned that the cap was having a detrimental effect on recruitment in the care sector.

Around 30 Filipino migrant care workers, who make up a large proportion of skilled care workers in the industry, attended the hearing but were prevented from displaying a “Save our Senior Carers” banner in court.

The ruling gives some hope to employers stripped of their allocation of Certificates of Employment (CoS) which they issue to migrant workers, many of whom are here on Tier 4 student visas and are allowed to switch immigration categories whilst in the UK. The government has already announced plans to change this rule and force students to return home before applying for any change of immigration category.

Hundreds of care home employers have been appealing to the UK Border Agency to re-issue CoS certificates for desperately needed Senior Carers since the interim cap was introduced with less than two weeks warning.

One of the reasons now being given for refusing to issue the CoS was because the salary was below £20000, a fact put before the two judges during the hearing.  The minimum salary for Senior Carers, which are on the government’s official shortage occupations list, was set by the Home Office under the previous Work Permit scheme. 

The judgment, which largely turned on the earlier Pankina case, blocks Home Secretary Theresa May’s interim cap on migration, but only until the changes can be put before Parliament and on to the statute books or a widely expected appeal is lodged.

The permanent cap, limiting Tier 2 visas to around 21,000 workers, will be implemented next April.

In response to the judgment, Immigration Minister Damian Green said:

‘Today’s judgment will have no impact on the permanent limit on non-European workers the government will introduce next April.

‘This ruling is about process, not policy – the policy of having a limit has not been found to be unlawful.

‘The court’s ruling rests on a technicality. We will set this right in the next few days to ensure we can continue to operate an interim limit.

‘We remain firmly committed to reducing net migration to the tens of thousands, and will continue to do everything in our power to prevent a rush of applications before our more permanent measures are in place.’

See also:

Immigration Cap ruled illegal

ECCA Tier 2 Immigration Cap High Court legal challenge starts today

Vince Cable says immigration cap is damaging British industry  

UK Immigration Cap could damage higher education

Immigration cap already in place – for Care Workers

If you need any immigration advice or help with Sponsorship or Work Permits, Visa, ILR/Settlement, Citizenship, dependant visa or an appeal against a refusal please email: or visit

Spread the Word, like or share this page, your friends will also love it and thanks for it.

Do you employ foreign workers? Don't risk a £20,000 fine and a possible custodial sentence. We can advice on Entrepreneur Visas, Investor Visas and Home Office sponsor licence compliance for your business. Use the button below to schedule an appointment...


Immigration Adviser, Speaker and Author See also: Profile - Profile:!/groups/14119859749/

16 Responses to “Interim Immigration Cap unlawful High Court Judges Rule”
Read them below or add one

  1. […] Interim Immigration Cap unlawful High Court Judges Rule […]

  2. […] Interim Immigration Cap unlawful High Court Judges Rule […]

  3. […] The news will bring little cheer to the care industry which desparately needs shortage occupation listed Senior Care Workers, but are being thwarted by the interim immigration cap, which was ruled unlawful following a legal challenge by trade boy ECCA. […]

  4. […] Interim Immigration Cap unlawful High Court Judges Rule […]

  5. […] lost this allocation when Home Secretary announced the interim cap, which was later ruled unlawful in the High Court following a challenge by the ECCA last […]

  6. […] their CoS (Certificate of Employment for Tier 2) allocation snatched from them last year when the interim cap was […]

  7. […] workers and international students facing a raft of immigration rule changes and the interim cap on migration, which means their employers are unable to renew their working visas. For those with less than […]

  8. […] Interim Immigration Cap unlawful High Court Judges Rule […]

  9. […] Interim Immigration Cap unlawful High Court Judges Rule […]

  10. […] Interim Immigration Cap unlawful High Court Judges Rule […]

  11. […] The UK Border Agency has published an official statement on last weeks decision by two judges to rule that the interim cap on non-EU immigration is unlawful. […]

  12. Just wondering that can this also effect or delay the new rules coming out in April 2011 for Tier 1 or 2 applications.

    I was planning to apply for Tier1 in May/June 2011 but I think I am left with no luck.

    Can someone please reply?

  13. […] Interim Immigration Cap unlawful High Court Judges Rule […]

  14. Just wondering that can this also effect or delay the new rules coming out in April 2011 for Tier 1 or 2 applications.

    Reply will be appreciated.

  15. Government should carry a suvey before putting any such rule on non-EU workers. This country finds its economy with economic migrant because we work hard on low rate compare to a British worker and perform morefor what we get paid. Now students in this country brings millions and millions pound and whatever hours they are doing its been helping the employers in terms of cost of manpower as i mention earlier. Students from non-EU country are more qualifried and skillful.If tomorrow government will restrict students from taking job, there will a chaos in those care homes and vulnerable people in thier homes dependent on care workers. So i believe government must be very careful before taking any action. However there are other countries attracting these skillful fellows so, it is better to reflect before reacting.Thanks.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked by *.

You must beLogged in to post a comment.