Notice: wp_enqueue_script was called incorrectly. Scripts and styles should not be registered or enqueued until the wp_enqueue_scripts, admin_enqueue_scripts, or login_enqueue_scripts hooks. Please see Debugging in WordPress for more information. (This message was added in version 3.3.0.) in /home/immigration/public_html/wp-includes/functions.php on line 4138
Are British judges are ‘overprotecting’ immigrant criminals’ human rights or just doing their job? | Immigration Matters

Want to learn more about UK/EU Immigration Law? Click Act Now to learn more... Act Now

Hide
Show
Call Us +44 7950 458 464 | info@immigrationmatters.co.uk
 Categories : News

 

Alasdair Palmer writing for the Telegraph asks if judges are going too far in protecting the rights of convicted foreign criminals, or are they merely upholding the law?

He writes:

It is not easy to find anyone who thinks it is acceptable that Britain should be unable to deport immigrants who have no right to be here, either because their claim to residence is bogus, or because they have committed, and been sentenced for, very serious crimes.

But the Home Office finds it increasingly difficult to eject foreigners – even when they have been convicted of crimes such as rape and murder.

Politicians are as frustrated about this situation as Home Office officials, and most of the rest of us. But no one seems able to do anything about it, because the source of the trouble is the Human Rights Convention – something which cannot be modified by Parliament, and whose interpretation is determined by rulings given by judges, first in British courts, and then in the “Grand Chamber”, the ultimate appeal court in Strasbourg.

Article 8 of the Convention gives everyone the right to respect for family life. The Courts have gradually extended the scope and meaning of that right, to the point that now it can be used to defeat even clear evidence that an individual’s continued presence in the UK is undesirable.

“There is a huge emphasis on not separating children from their mothers and fathers”, one adjudicator, who works in the tribunal system where appeals are first heard, explained to me.

“Families can be dysfunctional, relations between members can barely exist. Indeed, very often fathers don’t just live separately from the children they claim to have: they have hardly seen those children at all. But if they can prove that they have a child in this country, that can be enough, under the right to family life, to ensure that they cannot be deported.”

 

Rocky Gurung, an immigrant from Nepal who was convicted of killing an innocent man by throwing him into the River Thames, was allowed to stay in Britain because it would have breached his human rights to separate him from his parents, who live in the UK. Ends.

Source: Daily Telegraph.

What’s your view?  Please comment below.

There have been a number of recent high profile immigration appeals and Human Rights cases which have gone against the government in the courts, for instance, Abu Hamza’s British passport appeal and X-Factor contestant Gamu’s mother’s visa refusal, which was overturned on appeal.

Then there was the story of foreign criminals being paid £1500 to return home after serving their sentence.

But should we blame judges for interpreting and upholding the law? In many cases the law being upheld is related to immigration rules and the ruling has nothing to do with the Human Rights Act at all.

See also:

Abu Hamza wins British passport appeal bid

Wikileaks founder Julian Assange refused bail in UK court

X Factor’s Gamu Nhengu visa refusal reversed on appeal

Foreign criminals paid £1,500 to go home after serving sentence

Immigration Minister defends return scheme for foreign prisoners

UK Border Agency ‘unlawful’ in revoking College Tier 4 Sponsors Licence High Court rules

Interim Immigration Cap unlawful High Court Judges Rule

If you need any immigration advice or help with Sponsorship or Work Permits, Visa, ILR/Settlement, Citizenship, dependant visa or an appeal against a refusal please email: 

info@immigrationmatters.co.uk or visit www.immigrationmatters.co.uk

Spread the Word, like or share this page, your friends will also love it and thanks for it.



Do you employ foreign workers? Don't risk a £20,000 fine and a possible custodial sentence. We can advice on Entrepreneur Visas, Investor Visas and Home Office sponsor licence compliance for your business. Use the button below to schedule an appointment...

About

Immigration Adviser, Speaker and Author See also: www.LinkedIn.com Profile - http://www.linkedin.com/profile/edit?trk=hb_tab_pro_top www.Ecademy.com Profile: http://www.ecademy.com/account.php?id=110038 http://www.facebook.com/#!/groups/14119859749/

4 Responses to “Are British judges are ‘overprotecting’ immigrant criminals’ human rights or just doing their job?”
Read them below or add one

  1. […] Are British judges are ‘overprotecting’ immigrant criminals’ human rights or just doing their … […]

  2. There is no way to deport someone who has his children born in UK as british citizen by thier father or mother being british citizen. How can somone deport mother, whose husband and 2 children r pure british by birth and by passport as well. These news headline does not show the clear picture. ofcourse, the person will be fined or imprisoned for any of their wrong doing but not deported.

  3. […] Are British judges are ‘overprotecting’ immigrant criminals’ human rights or just doing their … […]

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked by *.

You must beLogged in to post a comment.