Notice: wp_enqueue_script was called incorrectly. Scripts and styles should not be registered or enqueued until the wp_enqueue_scripts, admin_enqueue_scripts, or login_enqueue_scripts hooks. Please see Debugging in WordPress for more information. (This message was added in version 3.3.0.) in /home/immigration/public_html/wp-includes/functions.php on line 4138
‘Pet cat Human Rights Appeal’ overstaying student was a shoplifter | Immigration Matters

Want to learn more about UK/EU Immigration Law? Click Act Now to learn more... Act Now

Call Us +44 7950 458 464 |
 Categories : News


The illegal immigrant, who is the subject of a ministerial bust up between the Home Secretary and Ken Clarke, allowed to stay in the UK partly because he owned a cat was given a police caution for shoplifting, The Daily Telegraph has revealed.

Ranzo Avila, who was at the centre of a row among senior Tories, overstayed his student visa but was allowed to stay in Britain after an immigration judge ruled in his favour in 2008. He concluded that the Bolivian’s right to family life would be breached because he was in an established relationship — reinforced by the fact that the couple had bought a cat.

Immigration court records showed that he first came to the attention of officials after being arrested for shoplifting but not charged. But it emerged that Mr Avila admitted shoplifting from Debenhams in Oxford Street, London, in 2007 and received a police caution. It is understood that he took four items of clothing into a changing room and then tried to conceal them.

However, such an offence does not cross the threshold for when a foreign national would face deportation, which is someone who has been sentenced to at least a year in prison.

Mr Avila has not spoken since his case was thrust into the limelight in a row at the Conservative Party Conference over the use of human rights laws.

Kenneth Clarke, the Justice Secretary, ridiculed a claim by Theresa May, the Home Secretary, that a Bolivian had been allowed to remain in Britain because of his cat.

The Daily Telegraph told yesterday how the cat did play a role in the case after the judge in the 2008 appeal suggested that separating him from the pet could cause “mental distress”. The man, now 36, had argued his right to a family life under Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights because he had been with his boyfriend for four years.

Judge James Devittie said their joint ownership of a pet named Maya reinforced the quality of their family life and suggested that separating them could cause the man emotional trauma.

Following an appeal by the Home Office, a second judge ruled that the main reason that the Bolivian could stay was because of a technical error by officials.

Mr Avila is still with his partner and is eligible to apply for indefinite leave to remain in Britain when his current leave comes up for renewal next year. If granted it paves the way for him to apply for British citizenship.

The Tory row deepened on Thursday after Mr Clarke was forced to express “regret” for describing Mrs May’s use of the cat case as “laughable and childlike”.

The so called Human Rights ‘cat’ saga has made a laughing stock out of the UK immigration system and caused a cabinet rift which could see the end of Justice Secretary Ken Clarke’s senior level career, as fellow Ministers are not supposed to openly disagree with the party line or citicise each other in public.

In a separate case, a convicted thief who lied about his nationality is to sue the Home Office for damages after a court ruled that he had been unlawfully detained awaiting deportation.

Mounir Raki won a High Court ruling that the length of his detention pending his removal — four years and seven months — was “self evidently unreasonable”.

Later, his solicitors said Mr Raki, instead of being released, had been “cynically” arrested and held on a charge relating to an alleged forged birth certificate.

He originally served six months in prison after being convicted on two counts of theft. He was then detained pending his removal to Morocco.

On his arrest in July 2006, Raki, who is in his thirties, unsuccessfully claimed asylum on the basis that he was Moroccan and in danger of persecution if sent back to his home country.

Although he subsequently told a probation officer that he had in fact grown up in the Palestinian territories, language analysis suggested he did not speak Arabic as a Palestinian would and the Home Office asserted it was “beyond reasonable doubt” he was Moroccan. Source: The Telegraph.

See also:

UK Home Office to close off route to citizenship


New Tier 4 sponsor guidance published for Highly Trusted Sponsorship – will your private college qualify?

Crackdown on immigration fraud – banks and UKBA to share information on debtors 

New format for UKBA Tier 4 sponsors guidance

Pre Tier 4 students in the UK under the Immigration Rules that were in place before 31 March 2009

New Tier 4 student visa rules now in force

Students in the UK on temporary Tier 4 visas are not ‘migrants’

Immigration Rules for Bulgarian and Romanian nationals

Free Movement of EU nationals explained

Comprehensive Sickness Insurance now required for Bulgarian and Romanian study work yellow cards

If you need any immigration advice or help with Sponsorship or Work Permits, Visa, ILR/Settlement, Citizenship, dependant visa or an appeal against a refusal please email: or visit

Looking for a college or University or need advice?

UKUS is a free University and College Admissions and advice service based in London, UK. Students interested in studying abroad can complete the Online UKUS Registration Form for more details.

Spread the Word, like or share this page, your friends will also love it and thanks for it.

Do you employ foreign workers? Don't risk a £20,000 fine and a possible custodial sentence. We can advice on Entrepreneur Visas, Investor Visas and Home Office sponsor licence compliance for your business. Use the button below to schedule an appointment...


Immigration Adviser, Speaker and Author See also: Profile - Profile:!/groups/14119859749/

10 Responses to “‘Pet cat Human Rights Appeal’ overstaying student was a shoplifter”
Read them below or add one

  1. […] ‘Pet cat Human Rights Appeal’ overstaying student was a shoplifter […]

  2. […] there was the so called ‘pet cat appeal’ student who was allowed to stay in the UK partly because he owned a cat, even though he had […]

  3. […] ‘Pet cat Human Rights Appeal’ overstaying student was a shoplifter […]

  4. […] making this up, he had a pet cat”. The pet cat, it turned out, had been used to demonstrate that his relationship with his partner constituted shared ‘family life’, which would be wrong to break […]

  5. […] not making this up, he had a pet cat”. The pet cat, it turned out, had been used to demonstrate that his relationship with his partner constituted shared ‘family life’, which would be wrong to break […]

  6. […] ‘Pet cat Human Rights Appeal’ overstaying student was a shoplifter […]

  7. […] The Conservatives hope to seize back the political initiative after their party conference was overshadowed by an embarrassing public row over how an illegal overstaying Bolivian student used in his appeal ownership of a pet cat as part of a Human Rights Act ruling to secure residency in Britain. […]

  8. […] ‘Pet cat Human Rights Appeal’ overstaying student was a shoplifter […]

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked by *.

You must beLogged in to post a comment.